Cheavon Clarke Rejects Chris Billam-Smith’s Handshake — But Their Career Crossroads Matters More
Cheavon Clarke refused Chris Billam-Smith’s handshake during a live fight-week face-off on November 5, adding one more uncomfortable moment to a rivalry that began long before either man reached the professional stage.
The gesture was not a complete rejection of sportsmanship. According to Sky Sports, Clarke declined the handshake but accepted a fist bump before the two cruiserweights settled into a prolonged staredown. That distinction matters because it complicates the easiest interpretation of the scene. Clarke clearly wanted distance, but the exchange did not necessarily establish the kind of personal hostility that boxing promotion often tries to manufacture from a few tense seconds.
Billam-Smith and Clarke are scheduled to headline Zuffa Boxing 12 on November 7 at London’s Copper Box Arena, according to the UFC’s official event preview. Their fight arrives a decade after Clarke defeated Billam-Smith in the 2016 amateur national championship final—a result that helped shape both careers in dramatically different ways.
The rejected handshake may sell the grudge.
The fight will determine whether Billam-Smith’s championship experience still separates him from serious cruiserweight opposition or whether Clarke is ready to convert his amateur pedigree and professional resilience into the defining victory his career needs.
The Tension Started With an Amateur Fight in 2016
Clarke’s issue with Billam-Smith appears to involve more than the usual pre-fight attempt to create intensity. During their fight-week interview, Clarke addressed the idea that his victory in the 2016 amateur national championship final had taken an opportunity away from Billam-Smith.
“I never stole” his place, Clarke told Sky Sports, arguing that both men received opportunities after the result.
Clarke subsequently advanced into the Great Britain international system and competed at the Olympic Games, according to Sky Sports. Billam-Smith’s path moved in another direction, but it did not end with that amateur disappointment. He has said the defeat ultimately led him to trainer Shane McGuigan, whom he credits with bringing out the best in him.
That makes the old result more significant than a simple entry in an amateur record. For Clarke, the victory helped validate his place among Britain’s leading amateur cruiserweights. For Billam-Smith, the defeat became part of the redirection that eventually shaped his professional career.
Billam-Smith went on to defeat Lawrence Okolie for the WBO cruiserweight title in 2023, according to Sky Sports. Whatever frustration followed the loss to Clarke, his professional accomplishments eventually carried him to a level that the amateur result alone could never have guaranteed.
The rivalry therefore contains an unusual contradiction. Clarke won their first meaningful encounter, but Billam-Smith built the more accomplished professional résumé. One man owns the historical victory between them. The other has already reached the championship level Clarke is still attempting to establish himself within.
That is why their November 7 meeting is more than a delayed rematch. It is an opportunity to determine which version of their shared history matters now.
The Handshake Changes the Mood, Not the Stakes
Clarke’s decision to reject the handshake raises the emotional temperature surrounding the main event. It gives the audience a sharp visual, reinforces the history between the fighters and suggests that Clarke does not intend to treat Billam-Smith like a friendly acquaintance during fight week.
It does not explain why he made that choice.
The reviewed reporting does not establish Clarke’s precise reason for refusing the handshake while accepting a fist bump. Treating the moment as proof of deep personal resentment would therefore require speculation. The two gestures may carry different meanings for Clarke, or the refusal may have been no more than an attempt to maintain a competitive edge before the fight.
Accepting the fist bump is important because it prevents the scene from becoming a clean story of total disrespect. Clarke declined one gesture but agreed to another. He maintained tension without refusing every form of acknowledgment.
The face-off also changes nothing measurable about the matchup. It does not add a victory to either man’s record, prove that one fighter is mentally stronger or establish the contest as a title fight or formal sanctioning-body eliminator. The reviewed sources provide no official fight-week weights, purse figures or current sanctioning-body rankings.
Those limits matter because boxing regularly allows promotional moments to become substitutes for sporting information. A refused handshake is easy to replay. A long staredown can be presented as evidence that a fight has become personal. Neither tells us how Billam-Smith will handle Clarke’s pressure, how Clarke will respond to Billam-Smith’s experience or which man can impose himself when the atmosphere gives way to actual exchanges.
The confrontation made the rivalry more visible.
It did not decide anything.
Billam-Smith Has the Stronger Professional History to Defend
Billam-Smith enters this fight with an accomplishment that Clarke has not yet matched: he has held a major cruiserweight championship.
His 2023 victory over Okolie established that he could deliver on a significant professional stage. It also completed a journey that became more interesting because of the amateur setback against Clarke. Billam-Smith did not simply recover from that defeat. He followed a different route and reached a championship destination.
The question now is whether that period still reflects what he can produce in the present.
A former champion cannot rely indefinitely on what he accomplished several fights or several years earlier. Championship experience remains valuable, but its value has to be demonstrated against an opponent who believes the established name is available to be beaten. Clarke is not meeting Billam-Smith to admire what he did against Okolie. He is attempting to use Billam-Smith’s reputation as the foundation of his own breakthrough.
That creates pressure on Billam-Smith beyond the old amateur history. A victory would support the argument that his professional development, experience and championship-level achievement have placed lasting distance between him and the fighter who defeated him in 2016. It would show that the amateur result belongs to another phase of their careers.
A defeat would reopen harder questions. Losing to Clarke again would not erase Billam-Smith’s WBO title victory, but it would weaken the idea that his championship years still describe his current place in the cruiserweight picture. It would also allow a result from a decade ago to become the opening chapter of a much more damaging professional conclusion.
Billam-Smith is not fighting to rewrite his entire career.
He is fighting to prove that its best period still has present-day value.
Clarke Needs to Turn Resilience Into a Defining Victory
Clarke’s professional case rests on different evidence. Sky Sports reported that he recovered from two knockdowns to stop Jack Massey in his most recent fight. That performance demonstrated resilience under serious pressure and showed that Clarke cannot be dismissed simply because a fight turns against him.
Billam-Smith has said he believes he can stop Clarke if he hurts him. Clarke’s response was that he should never be counted out. Both statements are predictions from the fighters, not established outcomes, but Clarke’s recovery against Massey gives his position a recent foundation.
Surviving danger, however, is not the same as controlling a career.
Clarke now needs the kind of victory that changes how he is discussed. His amateur pedigree is already documented. His progression through the Great Britain setup and to the Olympics demonstrated his ability at that level. His comeback against Massey showed professional toughness. What remains missing is a win over an opponent with Billam-Smith’s championship history.
Defeating Billam-Smith would connect the different parts of Clarke’s career. The 2016 amateur victory would no longer feel like a distant fact being revived for promotional purposes. It would become the beginning of a competitive pattern, followed by a professional win over the same opponent after Billam-Smith had reached the top of the division.
That would give Clarke something more valuable than a dramatic face-off: relevance built through opposition.
A loss would not eliminate everything he has accomplished, but it would place his professional ceiling under greater scrutiny. Clarke would still have the amateur credentials and the evidence of his toughness against Massey. He would not have the victory needed to show that those qualities can carry him past a proven former champion in a major main event.
Billam-Smith is defending the meaning of what he has already achieved.
Clarke is fighting for the achievement that could redefine what comes next.
The Fight Will Decide Which History Matters
The central question is not whether Clarke should have accepted the handshake. It is whether the amateur result from 2016 still tells us anything useful about the fighters they have become.
A Billam-Smith victory would suggest that the years since their first meeting changed the competitive balance. It would support the idea that his development under McGuigan, his experience and his championship accomplishment have created a professional separation that did not exist in the amateurs.
A Clarke victory would produce the opposite conclusion. It would transform the old result from a piece of fight-week history into the foundation of a credible professional breakthrough. Clarke would have beaten Billam-Smith before either man turned professional and then defeated him again after Billam-Smith became a former world champion.
That is the evidence neither man can provide during an interview.
The handshake refusal may have clarified that Clarke has no interest in making the week comfortable. Billam-Smith’s stoppage prediction may have clarified how decisively he expects to win. Clarke’s response may have reminded everyone that he has already recovered from severe trouble.
None of those moments can establish who remains a serious cruiserweight factor.
Only the fight can do that.
LET’S TALK ABOUT IT
Did Clarke’s refusal to shake hands reveal genuine resentment, or was accepting the fist bump enough to show that the moment was competitive rather than personal?
Which fighter has more at stake on November 7: the former champion protecting his relevance or the challenger seeking his defining professional win?
Outlets cited in this story
- Sky Sports
Spot an error? Send a correction. We fix mistakes in the open.
